The reason Alex and Lorelei have their home office in a closet instead of in one of the spare bedrooms: They had it in a spare bedroom at first, but Alex was interrupted too often by Lorelei carrying him off to the nearby bed.
518
pages
ALL POSTS
All posts by Kjnoren
1
@Sajo1453 I think “Like a Professional” is the superior one among smutty stories (despite being noncanon). It manages to have a proper plot instead of having in effect two unrelated scenes (for lack of a better word) mashed together. Its commentary on sex work may not be as deep as the one on joyful sex in “Supportive Relationships”, but I think it is functions better as a story; in “Supportive Relationships” we pretty much get an infodump, albeit an amusing one from Rachel. I also think the sexual-anticipation feeling is stronger in “Like a Professional”, but what one finds erotic is extremely personal.
0
In my case, I say the duo of “Guardians” and “Strangers”. Two excellent intrusion fantasies with plenty of atmosphere and immersion, but which use the intrusion to entirely different and opposite effects.
What is your favourite short story by Elliott Kay?
0
Since anyone can reply to a poll, but commenting requires an account.
I prefer the new one.
I prefer the old one.
Neither one is good enough for Lorelei.
2 Votes in Poll
Experiment with a new (and IMO more literary font) here on the wiki. Please let me know what you think!
Yes, on the $5 level
Yes, on the $3 level
Yes, on the $1 level
I used to, but not anymore
No, never
4 Votes in Poll
Currently, this wiki has plenty of large navboxes. However, I'm not sure they are the best tools for the job in their current form. They have poor usability due to being hidden and providing lots of links in close proximity with little context. They also create lots of redlinks and large amounts of repeated data across pages.
I'm not necessarily thinking of removing navboxes entirely, but make them a lot more focused. Each one would be focused on a single group with clear connections between all the members of the group.
Elliott Kay has a Patreon, and regularly posts stuff there. It includes short stories, sneak peeks for upcoming works, world building notes, and AMAs.
Some similar wikis include Patreon material indiscriminately (eg October Daye), but I'm not sure it's the best route. On the other hand, that stuff is posted there is of interest in and of itself.
I'm thinking of not using any of the information posted on Patreon, but include the short stories in the bibliography and series overview pages. That information is publically available, though the content itself is locked.
Right now, there are lots of spoiler warnings here in various articles. I'm not sure it's worth the effort.
Visitors to wikis of this type tend to not be the type of persons who are concerned with spoilers.
Several of the works are several years old. Having spoilers around for books that was published several years ago is needless cruft.
The spoiler warnings on this site are poorly executed, since they do not block the spoiler text and are not particularly prominent. The spoiler texts are also followed by non-spoiler texts (see e.g. Onyx)
The spoiler warnings break up the layout of the page and add visual cruft to it.
My recommendation would be to remove all individual spoiler warnings, and instead the front page should note that the wiki as a whole contains spoilers up to and including a specific work.
If something is deemed to require spoilers, it should be moved to a specific page, with a prominent spoiler warning on top of the page, like having Onyx/Onyx in Past Due
(Edited by Kjnoren)
@Enclaive I checked the fandom.com terms of use and community creation policy, and while it is not allowed to post or transmit pornographic content, there is no such language regarding linking such content. I also believe that the pornography clause is much more aimed at images rather than text.
If you're still uncomfortable with links to literotica, I won't hold it against you if you don't want to include it, but I'm 99% sure that it won't cause any issues for this particular wiki. And in the 1% case, the most that will happen is a removal of the link.